

War Made Invisible – How America Hides the Human Toll or Its Military Machine


Recent Articles:
- Daniel Ellsberg Speaks to Us as the War on Iran Continues
- The Actual Gavin Newsom Is Much Worse Than You Think
- Ending Republican Control Will Require Overcoming the Democratic Leadership
- Why is the Democratic party hiding its 2024 autopsy report?
- We Need to Know How Corporate Democrats Made President Trump Possible
-
Who Let the Blue Dogs Out?
By Norman SolomonThis is a grim story about the care and feeding of a Blue Dog.Right now, Congresswoman Jane Harman is facing a serious primary challenge from a genuine progressive, Marcy Winograd, in Southern California's 36th congressional district.
Last Saturday afternoon, I sat on stage with both candidates and other panelists at a forum during the California Democratic Party convention in Los Angeles. The room was filled with several hundred progressive delegates.
Harman has been refusing to debate her opponent, but she couldn't stay away from the forum that afternoon. The entire convention would be voting the next day on whether to withhold endorsement of her for re-election.
The incumbent is a member of the center-right caucus of House Democrats known as the Blue Dog Coalition. In sharp contrast, she chose not to join the Congressional Progressive Caucus. When I asked why, Harman dodged the question.
Winograd promptly brought their differences into focus. She called for the government "to invest in housing, education, healthcare, transportation — not to perpetuate a war economy that is draining us, robbing us of money that we desperately need." And she added: "I challenge my opponent to stop voting for this war machine."
While belonging to the largest caucus on Capitol Hill (with a membership now above 80), some members of the Progressive Caucus often say that they need more colleagues who'll be willing to vote against war and in favor of a truly progressive legislative agenda.
But if Progressive Caucus members want to move the House of Representatives in a progressive direction, you'd never know it when there's a chance to replace a Blue Dog with a progressive.
***** ***** ***** ***** *****
Harman — who once proclaimed "I am proud to be introduced as the best Republican in the Democratic Party" — has been straining lately to present herself as progressive while she tries to fend off the Winograd challenge.
With that goal, Harman has trumpeted endorsements from several well-known members of the Progressive Caucus. In particular, she has synced up her campaign spin with two of them from California — Henry Waxman and Lynn Woolsey.
Rep. Waxman came through with a January fundraising letter that declared: "In Marcy Winograd's foreign policy, Israel would cease to exist." The powerful congressman went on to trash the co-founder of LA Jews for Peace as an enemy of Israel: "In Marcy Winograd's vision, Jews would be at the mercy of those who do not respect democracy or human rights."
In the same month, the co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Rep. Woolsey, startled longtime progressive admirers when her name headlined the invitation to a fundraiser for Harman's campaign.
Within days, an open letter to Woolsey — initially signed by Progressive Democrats of America leaders Tim Carpenter, Mimi Kennedy, Donna Smith and me — gained more than 3,000 signatures from PDA activists across the country. We asked Woolsey to cancel her scheduled high-profile appearance at the Harman fundraiser.
"Given your longstanding and exemplary leadership on a wide range of peace and justice issues, it would be counterproductive to aid Rep. Harman's re-election efforts," we wrote. "Her pro-war record is well known, having voted most recently to spend billions to continue the occupation of Iraq and escalate in Afghanistan. Her October 2002 vote to authorize the invasion of Iraq was in stark contrast to the ‘no' votes by most House Democrats."
Our letter added: "Harman has an equally appalling record on civil liberties, having lobbied the New York Times to suppress the story about Bush's wiretaps on the eve of the 2004 election, then going on television to defend the illegal wiretaps. In addition, she voted for the bankruptcy bill, then more recently voted against mortgage relief in bankruptcy court, despite the fact that several thousand of her constituents are facing foreclosure. On the health care front, she recently voted against fast-tracking affordable generic medications for patients with breast cancer, brain tumors, Parkinson's and rare diseases."
And we noted that primary challenges to incumbent Blue Dog Democrats are essential for replacing pro-war Congress members with genuine progressives: "The reason that we have Rep. Donna Edwards in the House today as a stalwart advocate for peace and justice is precisely because of her successful primary campaign that unseated a non-progressive Democratic incumbent. Surely such victories are in the interests of all progressives."
Meanwhile, the entire executive board of the California Democratic Party's Progressive Caucus — the largest caucus in the state party — also wrote a public letter to Woolsey asking her not to go through with the Harman fundraiser.
When Woolsey went ahead with the Harman event, there was scant significance to the modest amount of funds raised. (Money is not a problem for Harman, one of the richest members of Congress.) What Woolsey's appearance conferred on Harman's campaign was the imprimatur of a political embrace from a longtime peace advocate who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus.
As the winter went on, progressives in California hoped that such maneuvers would not be repeated. But the care and feeding of a Blue Dog is apt to be habitual.
***** ***** ***** ***** *****
On Friday, April 16 — just before the opening of the state Democratic Party convention that would decide whether to endorse Congresswoman Harman for re-election — the delegates received robo-calls from a heavyweight member of Congress. "I'm Henry Waxman, and my congressional district is right next to that of Jane Harman, who I'm proud to support for re-election," the message began. It concluded: "We need to keep effective leaders like Jane in Congress."
On Sunday morning, I was one of more than 1,000 delegates to enter the convention hall and find a four-page glossy flyer that had been placed on every chair. Most of the first page was a picture of Harman and Woolsey, standing together in front of the Capitol.
The photo caption was a quote from Congresswoman Woolsey: "Jane has proven herself to be a leader on Capitol Hill, and I join other Congressional progressives like John Conyers, Jim McGovern and Henry Waxman in endorsing her candidacy." The second page was devoted to a letter from Woolsey extolling Harman.
When delegates voted later that morning, Harman won endorsement, 599-417.
Harman had to go to extraordinary lengths to win a party endorsement that is usually automatic for incumbent Democrats in Congress. She was able to do so largely because one-third of state convention delegates are appointed by elected Democrats — incumbents who are very rarely willing to support any primary challenge to an incumbent.
It's one thing to support a Blue Dog Democrat in a general election against a Republican. It's quite another thing for members of the Progressive Caucus to defend a Blue Dog Democrat against a primary challenge from a genuine progressive Democrat.
In the case of the Harman-Winograd race, the best grassroots response from progressives around the country will be to strongly support the Winograd campaign between now and Election Day, June 8.
***** ***** ***** ***** *****
Soon after visiting Afghanistan last summer, I went to Capitol Hill and met with a few House members and staff. All of them were "anti-war" and involved with the Progressive Caucus. Yet the extent of insularity and the lack of urgency were stunning. Official Washington was numb.
What's propelling the Winograd campaign — with its passion, commitment, fearlessness and antipathy toward the corporate warfare state — is exactly what Congress and the country need.
Published on Wednesday, April 21, 2010 by CommonDreams.org
-
Going Beyond the Conventional Politics
Some good things happened at the California Democratic Party convention last weekend — including the solid endorsement of Prop 15, the California Fair Elections Act.And the state party was equally firm with a kick in the corporate pants of Prop 16, the anti-democratic ballot measure that PG&E is pushing with many millions of dollars.But we have a lot to ponder after Congresswoman Jane Harman — with an appalling pro-war, corporate-enmeshed, anti-civil-liberties record — was able to gain endorsement for re-election with major help from some progressive Democratic officeholders. I wrote about it yesterday in a piece titled “Who Let the Blue Dogs Out?”
That was a sad article to write. But facts must be faced, as we organize to move the Democratic Party — and government policies — in a more genuinely progressive direction.
On that note, I hope you’ll join me at an event coming up in Marin County this Monday night — "Organizing for Democracy: Taking Action in an Era of Crises.” I’ll be speaking there along with KALW Radio host Rose Aguilar, scholar Cynthia Boaz and author George Lakoff. (That’s 7 p.m. on April 26 at the Community Center, 618 B St., San Rafael.)
I’ve posted details about that event and others in the North Bay where I’ll also be speaking soon.
There’s truth in the saying: “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention.” A lot of people are mad at the status quo — but of course rage is hardly an indicator of insight or wisdom.
I wrote about the mixed bag of present-day populism in an op-ed article that the Marin Independent Journal printed recently, “Angry Politics Close to Home.”
Onward and hopefully upward!
Best wishes,
Norman
P.S. – I’m looking forward to the march for immigrant rights on Saturday, May 1, starting at noon in Santa Rosa at 665 Sebastopol Road. One of many actions nationwide the same day, the protest will challenge the legalistic harassment of immigrants, and we’ll also be marching in solidarity with students whose access to education is being blocked by unjust immigration policies. Human rights: Si se puede!
-
Speaking Schedule
Norman will be speaking soon in the North Bay… You are invited!
** Monday, April 26 — 7 p.m. — San Rafael Community Center, 618 B St., San Rafael
With a focus on "Organizing for Democracy: Taking Action in an Era of Crises," the speakers at this event will include Cynthia Boaz, George Lakoff, Rose Aguilar and Norman Solomon. Donation requested: $10. (No one turned away for lack of funds.) This is a benefit for two progressive organizations — Truthout.org and the Marin Peace & Justice Coalition. More informantion: 415-721-7241
** Tuesday, May 4 — 7 p.m. — Sonoma State University (The Cooperage building) in Rohnert Park
After a free screening of the documentary film "War Made Easy," based on Norman Solomon's book of the same name, Norman will be in conversation with author Tony Kashani about the media and politics of current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
** Tuesday, May 11 — Noon — Santa Rosa Junior College (Doyle Library), 1501 Mendicino Ave., Santa Rosa
"War Made Easy" will be shown without charge, followed by a Q&A with Norman Solomon, who will talk about the film and his book of the same name — and how the media spin for war has evolved in recent years.
For more information on the "War Made Easy" film: http://www.warmadeeasythemovie.org
-
Marin Voice: Angry politics close to home
The political landscape is making a lot of people mad at "elites." Populist resentments are common these days – even in affluent Marin.
When the mood turns bitter and corrosive, appeals for civility are nice. But they won't accomplish much unless we can address some key underlying causes of distress.
Read the full op-ed
-
Democracy and Its Foes, from the Legislature to PG&E
By NORMAN SOLOMON
Democracy
is dangerous — for those who are eager to concentrate power in the hands of a
few.For many
years, in California’s legislature, a minority of lawmakers — Republicans
enjoying an inordinate proportion of corporate backing — have thwarted moves
to boost state revenues with more progressive taxation. The conservative
legislators have been able to send the state budget into a tailspin.Right
now, as the California Democracy Act Coalition notes, “one third of the
legislature can block the will of the majority on both the budget and revenue.
This means that the majority of our representatives, who are elected by the
people, are unable to run the state the way voters want them to. As a result,
California, one of the wealthiest economies in the world, is billions of
dollars in debt and can’t protect and empower its citizens.”A
solution is a proposal called the California Democracy Act, which would amend California’s
constitution with 14 words: “All legislative actions on revenue and budget must
be determined by a majority vote.”This
effort, sometimes known as the California Majority Rule Campaign, has a steep
uphill climb to gather enough signatures for getting the measure onto the
statewide ballot in November. (To find out how you can help, go to www.CaliforniansForDemocracy.com.)
It’s a growing campaign, but it doesn’t have big money behind it.In sharp
contrast, Proposition 16 has very big money behind it — PG&E, the massive investor-owned
utility. Mega-dollars have already financed signature-gathering that secured a place
for Prop 16 on the June statewide ballot.A
detailed critique is at www.PowerGrab.info.
It’s not necessary to agree with everything on the website to see that its opposition
to Prop 16 is fundamentally sound. The ballot measure is an outrageous attempt
to set up a blockade of election democracy with a two-thirds requirement.
The Prop 16 initiative “is about a monopoly seeking to expand its fossil
empire based on captive customers who have no alternative but to pay for it,”
PowerGrab.info says. “PG&E doesn't want Californians being able to find
other suppliers that might reduce local need for their foreign fuels and their
power transmission infrastructure. The power grab would strategically threaten
California's energy security by eroding local control over energy and climate
planning — the very ability of local governments to govern themselves.”Many
millions of dollars are in the chute from PG&E to try to convince voters to
support the measure — the purpose of which, in the words of a state filing by
proponents last summer, is “to guarantee to ratepayers and taxpayers the right
to vote any time a local government seeks to use public funds, public debt,
bonds or liability, or taxes or other financing to start or expand electric
delivery service to a new territory or new customers, or to implement a plan to
become an aggregate electricity provider.”But the two-thirds requirement goes way
beyond guaranteeing people the right to vote on major decisions.The
reason we should support efforts to get the California Democracy Act initiative
on the ballot is the same reason we should work to defeat Prop 16 — in a word,
democracy.In one
instance, activists across the state are trying to end the tyranny of the
two-thirds rule in the legislature. In another instance, PG&E is trying to
establish the tyranny of a two-thirds rule for local approval of efforts to
change electricity arrangements.These are
issues of process that go to the core of democracy. And here in West Marin,
where passions run high and civic engagement is widespread, we have vital
opportunities to stand up for democratic principles.We can —
and should — vigorously debate proposals on revenues and budgets in
Sacramento. We can — and should — scrutinize any proposal for a deal that
commits local governments to energy contracts.But
requiring a two-thirds vote? That’s corporate obstructionism, not democracy.________________________________________________________
Norman Solomon is a national co-chair of the
Healthcare Not Warfare campaign and the author of many books including “War
Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.” He is a
co-chair of the Commission on a Green New Deal for the North Bay.[This article appeared in the March 18, 2010 edition of the West
Marin Citizen newspaper.] -
A Bomber Jacket Doesn’t Cover the Blood
President Obama has taken a further plunge into the kind of war abyss that consumed his predecessors — named Johnson, Nixon and Bush.
On Sunday, during his first presidential trip to Afghanistan, Obama stood before thousands of American troops to proclaim the sanctity of the war effort. He played the role deftly — a Commander-in-chief, rallying the troops — while wearing a bomber jacket…
Read the full column
-
A note from Norman
Spring greetings!
OK, this isn't the spring we wanted.
The new healthcare law doesn't even have a non-robust public option.
Wall Street is soaring, but Main Street is sagging with unemployment.
Climate protection is stalled in Congress.
And war keeps escalating in Afghanistan.
But here's a positive note: This Wednesday (March 31) at 8 p.m., KQED TV Channel 9 will air a special one-hour report on Martin Luther King — "A Call to Conscience" — focusing on his profound decision to oppose the Vietnam War. As the war effort in Afghanistan intensifies, Dr. King is speaking to us.
President Obama's speech to troops in Afghanistan on Sunday kept me up all night. Yesterday, the Huffington Post and other websites published my article "A Bomber Jacket Doesn't Cover the Blood."
While we shouldn't succumb to what King called "the paralysis of analysis," the quest to understand the context of our warfare state is essential. I've tried to be helpful along that line with a couple of recent articles — "War Politics: Numb and Number" and "War in a Box."
As a national co-chair of the Healthcare Not Warfare campaign, I often think about the grim effects of distorted budget priorities. As elsewhere, the figures are devastating in Marin County and Sonoma County.
Close to home, during the next couple of weeks, I'll be speaking on the radio and at events in Corte Madera, Berkeley and Oakland. For schedule details, please click here.
Last week, after Congress passed the healthcare bill, I stood under an archway at Union Station, near the Capitol, and did an interview with The Real News Network.
Later, I noticed some words chiseled into the marble overhead. The florid language was from a long-gone era, but the meaning could be summed up this way: The people of a nation should do unto others what they would like done unto them.
That's a pretty good summary of the progressive quest as we pursue the goals of healthcare for all, peace, gender equality, environmental protection, labor rights, humane immigration reform and so much more.
No matter how bad the news gets, we won't give up!
Best wishes,
Norman
-
Zero Public Option + One Mandate = Disaster
Not long ago, the most prominent supporters of the public option were touting it as essential for healthcare reform. Now, suddenly, it's incidental.
In fact, many who were lauding a public option as the key to a better healthcare future are now condemning just about anyone who insists that the absence of a public option makes the current bill unworthy of support…
Read the full column
-
War in a Box
The event on the House floor Wednesday afternoon was monumental — the first major congressional debate about U.S. military operations in Afghanistan since lawmakers authorized the invasion of that country in autumn 2001. But, as Rep. Patrick Kennedy noted with disgust on Wednesday, the House press gallery was nearly empty. He aptly concluded: "It's despicable, the national press corps right now."
Sure enough, the Thursday edition of the New York Times had no room for the historic debate on its front page, which did have room for a large Starbucks ad across the bottom…
Read the full column
-
War Politics: Numb and Number
Playwright Lillian Hellman said, "I cannot and will not cut my conscience to fit this year's fashions."
The statement was in a letter to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC). The year was 1952. We tell ourselves that the McCarthy era was vastly different than our own – but what about the political fashions of 2010?
This year's fashions cut mean figures on Washington's runways. Conformities lie, and people die..
A dozen years after Hellman defied HUAC, a senator defied the fearful conformity of 1964. Seeing the escalation of the Vietnam War on the near horizon, Wayne Morse spoke truth to – and about – power. The contrast with today's liberal baseline on Capitol Hill is painfully evident if you watch footage of Senator Morse for two minutes…
Read the full column