

War Made Invisible – How America Hides the Human Toll or Its Military Machine


Recent Articles:
- Daniel Ellsberg Speaks to Us as the War on Iran Continues
- The Actual Gavin Newsom Is Much Worse Than You Think
- Ending Republican Control Will Require Overcoming the Democratic Leadership
- Why is the Democratic party hiding its 2024 autopsy report?
- We Need to Know How Corporate Democrats Made President Trump Possible
-
The Return of Triangulation
The mosaic of Barack Obama's cabinet picks and top White House staff gives us an overview of what the new president sees as political symmetry for his administration. While it's too early to gauge specific policies of the Obama presidency, it's not too soon to understand that "triangulation" is back.
In the 1990s, Bill Clinton was adept at placing himself midway between the base of his own party and Republican leaders. As he triangulated from the Oval Office — often polarizing with liberal Democrats on such issues as "free trade," deregulation, "welfare reform" and military spending — Clinton did well for himself. But not for his party…
Read the full column.
-
Media Matters with Bob McChesney
Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon were on Media Matters with Bob McChesney on January 11th.
Play now:
RealAudio archive
Download: mp3 file
-
A Hundred Eyes for an Eye
Israelis and Arabs "feel that only force can assure justice," I. F. Stone noted soon after the Six-Day War in 1967. And he wrote, "A certain moral imbecility marks all ethnocentric movements. The Others are always either less than human, and thus their interests may be ignored, or more than human and therefore so dangerous that it is right to destroy them."
The closing days of 2008 have heightened the Israeli government's stature as a mighty practitioner of the moral imbecility that Stone described…
Read the full column.
-
The Silent Winter of Escalation
Sunday morning, before dawn, I read in the New York Times that “the
Pentagon is planning to add more than 20,000 troops to Afghanistan”
within the next 18 months — “raising American force levels to about
58,000″ in that country.” Then I scraped ice off a windshield and drove
to the C-SPAN studios, where a picture window showed a serene daybreak
over the Capitol dome.While I was on C-SPAN’s “Washington
Journal” for a live interview, the program aired some rarely seen
footage with the voices of two courageous politicians who challenged
the warfare state…Read the full column.
-
Norman Solomon on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal”
Update: Watch the segment
For the first time, excerpts from the film “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death” — based on the book of the same name by Norman Solomon – aired on C-SPAN nationwide Sunday, December 7. Norman appeared as a guest on the “Washington Journal” program for a live 40-minute segment that included footage from the documentary.
In comments prior to the broadcast, Norman said: “Among the ‘best and brightest’ who are set to oversee foreign policy for the next president, there appears to be a consensus for escalating the war in Afghanistan. The assumption bears an ominous resemblance to the political atmosphere and media tone during the mid-1960s, when the conventional wisdom was that everyone with a modicum of smarts knew that upping U.S. troop levels in Vietnam was a necessity.”
He added: “No less than in Vietnam several decades ago, the prospects for a military victory in Afghanistan are extremely slim. Far more likely is a protracted version of what CBS anchor Walter Cronkite famously called ‘a bloody stalemate’ in February 1968. But, in 2008, more important than whether the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan can bring ‘victory’ is the question of whether it should continue.
“Right now, the basic ingredients of further Afghan disasters are in place — including, pivotally, a dire lack of wide-ranging debate over Washington’s options. In an atmosphere reminiscent of 1965, when almost all of the esteemed public voices concurred with the decision by newly elected President Lyndon Johnson to deploy more troops to Vietnam, the tenet that the United States must send additional troops to Afghanistan is axiomatic in U.S. news media, on Capitol Hill and — as far as can be discerned — at the top of the incoming administration.
“But the problem with such a foreign-policy ‘no brainer’ is that the parameters of thinking have already been put in the rough equivalent of a lockbox. Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara and Lyndon Johnson approached Vietnam policy options no more rigidly than Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates and Barack Obama appear poised to pursue Afghanistan policy options. Such destructive group-think, including wonkish faith in the efficacy of massive violence, caused Martin Luther King Jr. to denounce what he called ‘the madness of militarism.’”
-
The Ideology of No Ideology
On Friday, columnist David Brooks informed readers that Barack Obama’s picks "are not ideological." The incoming president’s key economic advisers "are moderate and thoughtful Democrats," while Hillary Clinton’s foreign-policy views "are hardheaded and pragmatic."
On Saturday, the New York Times front page reported that the president-elect’s choices for secretaries of State and Treasury "suggest that Mr. Obama is planning to govern from the center-right of his party, surrounding himself with pragmatists rather than ideologues."
On Monday, hours before Obama’s formal announcement of his economic team, USA Today explained that he is forming a Cabinet with "records that display more pragmatism than ideology."
The ideology of no ideology is nifty. No matter how tilted in favor of powerful interests, it can be a deft way to keep touting policy agendas as common-sense pragmatism — virtuous enough to draw opposition only from ideologues…
Read the full column.
-
Norman Solomon interview
A 25 minute interview with Norman Solomon by Detroit radio host Peter Werbe aired on November 16th.
An MP3 of the show is online you can download or listen to online.
The interview is towards the end two hours and ten minutes into the show after the hour and 45 minute call-in portion of the show and an interview with Robert Kuttner.
-
A Media Parable for ‘the Center’
It’s been 16 years since a Democrat moved into the White House. Now, the fog of memory and the spin of media are teaming up to explain that Barack Obama must hew to "the center" if he knows what’s good for his presidency.
"Many political observers," the San Francisco Chronicle reported days ago, say that Obama "must tack toward the political mainstream to avoid miscalculations made by President Bill Clinton, who veered left and fired up the 1994 Republican backlash." This storyline provides a kind of political morality play: The new president tried to govern from the left, and Democrats lost control of Congress just two years later.
But, if facts matter, the narrative is a real head-scratcher…
Read the full column.